Mewujudkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Melalui Case Management System (Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Bogor)

  • E. Agus Suryadi Fakultas Hukum, UPN Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • H. Supardi Fakultas Hukum, UPN Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: prosecutor’s office, case management system, integrated criminal justice system

Abstract

This legal writing motivated by the efforts made by the Bogor City State Prosecutor”s Office in order to make changes by implementing information technology innovations in handling general criminal cases, especially the handling of narcotics and psychotropic cases in order to realize good and professional governance. System, reduce abuse of power, and curb case administration from the SPDP stage to the implementation stage. The outline of this paper is to discuss the issue of implementing the Case Management System (CMS) in the data input process for handling narcotics and psychotropic crime cases at the Bogor City District Attorney”s Office in realizing an integrated criminal justice system. This research uses statutory, case, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The results showed that the data input process for handling cases of narcotics and psychotropic crimes was in accordance with the SOP, the application of an integrated case handling system in the Information Technology Integrated Case Management System (SPPT-TI) so that it could increase efficiency and effectiveness in case handling. However, there are still obstacles that were face, namely the lack of operator personnel and a lack of understanding of the application of the use of the Case Management System (CMS), but with these obstacles, training on CMS data entry conducted.

References

Buku

Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. (1976). Fungsi dan Perkembangan Hukum dalam Pembangunan Nasional. Bandung: Lembaga Penelitian Hukum dan Kriminologi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran.

Mas, Marwan. (2003). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. (1980). Hukum dan Masyarakat., Bandung: Angkasa.

____, (1991). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Situmorang, Mosgan, dkk. (2009). Laporan Penelitian Hukum tentang Penyederhanaan Proses Peradilan. Jakarta: Puslitbang Hukum Nasional BPHN.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (1985). Kamus Sosiologi. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Journal articles:

Abdullah, Sayidin. (2014), “Prinsip Efisiensi dalam Peradilan Tindak Pidana Perikanan”, Jurnal Fiat Justisia, Vol. 8 No. 3, p. 479.

Hairi, Prianter Jaya. (2011). “Antara Prinsip Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat dan Berbiaya Ringan dan Gagasan Pembatasan Perkara Kasasi”. Jurnal Negara Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 1.

Mardin, Nurhayati. (2007). “Makna Kepala Putusan Pengadilan: Keadilan Berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa (Tinjauan Rechphilosophie)”. Jurnal Hukum Aktualita., Vol. II No. 3.

Widodo, J. Pajar. (2012). “Reformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Mafia Peradilan”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 12 No. 1.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia

Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana

Keputusan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor: KEP-24/E/Ejp/12/2019 tanggal 02 Desember 2019 tentang Standar Operasional Prosedur Penanganan Perkara

Instruksi Jaksa Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2020, Sistem Manajemen Penanganan Perkara (Case Management System/CMS)

World Wide Web

Kejaksaan R.I (2010), “Criminal Justice System di Negara Hukum Indonesia. https://www.kejaksaan.go.id/unit_kejaksaan.php?idu=28&idsu=39&idke=0&hal=1&id=1661&bc=, diakses 16 November 2020.
Published
2021-03-09
Section
Articles
Abstract View: 417 PDF Download: 103